Waltine Nauta is a former longtime aide to Donald Trump. He is also a co-defendant in Trump’s national security documents case. He pleaded not guilty to multiple charges Special Counsel Jack Smith imposed on him.
Mr. Nauta is accused of conspiracy to obstruct justice, attempted document concealment, and making false statements. The Navy veteran hired a Florida-based lawyer, Stanley Woodward, to represent him.
Nauta’s Washington-based lawyer, Stanley Woodward, entered the not-guilty plea on behalf of his client. His boss, Donald Trump, had also pleaded not guilty to the charges marshaled against him.
The allegedly false statement made by Nauta was about his response to what he knew about moving boxes containing documents and records.
The questions prosecutors asked were vague and meant to ensnare him in a perjury trap or obstruction of justice. The lawyer already accused them of unethical behavior. [see here]
Independent reporter Michael Tracey wrote, “So they charge the body man [Nauta] as well because he gives a mumbling answer to an FBI agent asking if he knows anything that would ‘make the intelligence community feel better.’
“That’s the evidence the body man engaged in a conspiracy with Trump. Un-freakin-believable.”
Nauta replied, “I wish I could tell you. I don’t know.”
This is the Q&A that Tracey included in his comment.
Tracey pointed out that this was “[a]nother classic “voluntary interview” with the FBI, the kind where they just casually swing by and ask for some help. Body man [Nauta] happy to oblige. Ends up charged with “conspiracy to obstruct justice” because he didn’t think to have a team of lawyers prepare his answers in advance.”
He was referring to the framing of Gen. Flynn.
Another classic “voluntary interview” with the FBI, the kind where they just casually swing by and ask for some help. Bodyman happy to oblige. Ends up charged with “conspiracy to obstruct justice” because he didn’t think to have a team of lawyers prepare his answers in advance pic.twitter.com/IMaq33X5ss
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) June 9, 2023
So is this a new type of crime in our police state – vague answers? It sounds like a thought crime.
The DOJ also leaked a video of him moving boxes to suggest he was a criminal.
Oh, F me. The FBI agent/team and the prosecutor should be reprimanded for this crap. His answer “I don’t know” is a statement of fact based upon his recollection at that time. Let the azzwipe prosecutor prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that he did know. The judge should throw this out on first appearance and yell at the prosecutor for shameful conduct.
What the Hell is This! Jack (General Zod) Smith is going after Trump while he was still President regarding some meeting.
Jack Smith better clean up his act or take refuge in DC under the protection of the Biden Cartel! If he sets foot out he best learn from Columbian Judges and keep a low profile! The American People are fed up with his corruption!
This is a load of Effing Bull…! The FBI is truly a bunch of Damn Nazis. From now on it should be a requirement they are required to give Miranda rights to Anyone they interview, associated with any crime, no matter how tangential, because obviously grand juries and courts are unwilling to reign these bastards in. We’ve seen it time and time again when it came to FISA and that court had to intervene. It was ‘suppose’ to be corrected but we find out that these Nazis went back to their old ways once again. And we can’t expect Congress to do a damn thing about it.
More people should do what I do, always vote against the incumbent